Despite subcontracts being at the heart of every contracting business, few companies (big or small) can claim to have truly efficient subcontracting processes. As this article explains, even small improvements in your subcontracting processes can lead to material improvements in overall efficiencies and company profitability.
For most companies, the process of letting a subcontract looks something like this:
At each step of the process described above, time is lost. This can occur in a variety of ways, including:
Considered in isolation, each delay might not seem like much - which is why most companies tend to tolerate, and are reluctant to make changes to improve their processes. However if you consider how much time team members are spending on these processes, across all of your company's projects, this can add up to a significant amount of time.
Your company should be asking the question - is every member of your team doing the most valuable work they are capable of?
For example, is it a good use of a senior manager's time to be checking and adjusting subcontracts, or would their time be better spent on (say) overseeing client delivery, client service, business development or something else that might be more valuable to your organisation?
If the answer is 'no', there may ways that you can improve your subcontracting processes to free up people's time, and allow them to spend more time doing more valuable work. Below are some examples.
Most companies will have a standard form of subcontract template. (If yours doesn't, that is an obvious place to start. Learn about our simple subcontract template here.
Two issues commonly arise:
1. Your team finds your subcontract template painful to work with. There might be a large set of questions to answer (most of which are the same on every answer), there might be numerous documents to attach, and there might be 'company standard' special conditions to be added, depending on the nature of the project.
2. Different team members have their own, preferred set of changes, resulting in inconsistencies across the organisation. This can then give rise to further time spent by senior managers or subcontractors having to consider different versions of the same contract, even though the projects are likely the same.
Standardisation is a key way to drive efficiencies.
Consider:
Although this sounds obvious, it's something that is often overlooked.
Obviously a long document takes longer to read than a short one. And even if your subcontractor has no plans on reading your subcontract, a lengthier document may create the impression of a more onerous contract (regardless of whether that is in fact the case).
A longer document can therefore slow the signing process, lead to unwanted negotiations, and result in subcontractors incorporating risk premiums purely based on the 'feel' of your document. AS 4906 is 34 pages long, even before any annexures are added. We often see subcontracts from large contractors which over 50 pages. Our simple subcontract template is only 15 pages.
And whilst virtually all principals/head contractors prefer 'firm' contracts, stretching things too far can lead to unwanted outcomes - generally in the form of higher subcontractor pricing, greater subcontractor resistance to terms and more time spent in negotiating.
Your company might be in a privileged position of feeling that it can dictate terms. Even if that is true, it is worth considering whether your subcontract terms are hindering rather than creating value.
To make sure that your contract is as effective and as simple as it can be, you will need to engage the help of a specialist construction lawyer.
Most of the manual labour traditionally involved in assembling subcontracts can be replaced by technology. Further, recent advances in technology mean that automation technology that was once only available to larger contractors (through bespoke technology solutions) is now far more widely available.
For example, consider:
Internal approval processes often fall down in two ways.
First, there is waiting time while one team member waits for another to respond.
This is a workflow management issue. There are a variety of internal communication systems and workflow platforms that companies (including small ones) are using to identify and remove internal bottlenecks. You may already have access to some of them. Consider whether your internal systems and processes are working as well as they can be.
Second, the approval process can sometimes require the reviewer to effectively look at the entire subcontract, rather than considering issues by exception. Here, standardisation and automation can help. If all teams are using the same documents, and if a lot of the key detail is incorporated into your subcontracts by technology, there is less scope for human error and there should be fewer items for a reviewer to consider.
If your subcontractors request changes to your subcontract terms, it will usually be around the same types of issue. These might relate to extensions of time, caps on liquidated damages, aggregate limits on liability, consequential loss exclusions, and so on.
There are two benefits of having standardised responses:
The best way to produce the necessary documents is to involve a specialist construction lawyer. They will be able to quickly tell you what is normal (and what is not), what is material (and what is not), and they will be able to help you develop systems that are designed to consistently achieve good contract outcomes in the shortest possible timeframes.
It shouldn't take anyone in your organisation more than about a 1 minute (at most) to find an important document, such as a signed subcontract.
Templates, clause libraries and other valuable resources should all be kept in places that are as easy as possible for your team to find. Avoid systems that allow individual users to save important documents locally.
If you use a company intranet for this purpose, make sure the navigation is easy and it's otherwise well organised.
If you don't have a document management system in place, consider getting one. These can provide huge time savings for people at all levels of your organisation.
And if you are reliant on a 'shared folder' system, make sure that:
Technology developments and COVID have changed the ways that most companies do business. In contracting, one of the biggest advances is the move to digital contracts - even for large projects. Most jurisdictions in Australia will recognise digitally executed contracts.
There are two major benefits of digital contracts:
1. Digital contracts are signed faster. It's one thing for a large, hard copy bundle to be sent to a company for signing. Putting printing, binding and couriers to one side, it often takes time for a hard copy contract to find its way to the right person for signing. The benefit of a digital version is that it is sent immediately to the relevant person, right into their inbox.
2. Digital contracts are easier to store and easier to find. (Of course, this assumes that you have a well organised document management system, as discussed above.) Although many people will continue to prefer to work with hard copies, a move to digital will make it easier for your teams to find the document (in the office and when working remotely), it will free up storage and archival space, and overall lead to a less cluttered office environment.
There are now a range of technologies specifically designed for assembling and signing contract documents. (Docusign is just one of many.) We will discuss this in more detail in a future post.
Regardless of how good your systems are, they will only take you so far. Time can be wasted and mistakes can be made when a team member either:
It's also important to acknowledge that these problems can occur at all levels of your company, from the most junior person to the most senior.
Strong induction programs and regular, structured training are the best ways to bed down your systems. On-the-job training should support and be consistent with your more structured training programs. (If all of your training is 'on the job', you run the risk of inconsistent approaches throughout the organisation and senior management not being aware what is really going on.)
It's equally important to have clear escalation procedures, so that each member of your team knows who to call for help when they need it.
Although the vast majority of issues should be capable of being addressed by project teams and senior managers, there will be times when legal support is needed. Developing a close, ongoing relationship with a capable lawyer (whether internally or externally) is one way to ensure that your teams can obtain prompt support whenever required.
Companies striving for maximum efficiency are constantly re-evaluating their processes, to see if there are better ways they can do things. The three most common causes for further refinement are:
Further resources:
Learn more about our subcontract agreement template here.